Charity Finder
Back to directory
Comparison

Care For The Elderly Association Limited vs "Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited

Care For The Elderly Association Limited敬老護老愛心會有限公司
"Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited「我都得」教育基金有限公司

Key details

Effective date
13 March 2007
7 September 2012
Charity number
16/44583

About

Description
Established in 2007 (formerly known as the Care for The Elderly Charity Ticket Organising Committee), Care for the Elderly Limited is a charitable organisation registered with the Hong Kong Government and recognised by the Inland Revenue Department. Mission: To help elderly-serving organizations raise funds
"Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited is a charity dedicated to empowering underprivileged youth through transformative overseas experiences. The organisation provides scholarships for students to participate in a one-year high school exchange program in the United States. This opportunity is designed to broaden their horizons, inspire them to see a future full of possibilities, and help them break the cycle of intergenerational poverty. The fund operates on the belief that when young people can see a future, they will not give up on themselves.

Contact

Address
Room C, 3/F, 123 Tung Chau Street, Worldwide Centre, Tai Kok Tsui,Kowloon
A402 Tai Po Garden N. T., Hong Kong

Status

Subvented
No
No
IRD verified
Subsidiary
No
No
Crowdfunding

Categories

Target beneficiaries

Governance & transparency

Directors
Ting Shan NG,Francis Yin Ming CHAU,Lit Tung KWOK,Yuk Chi LEE,Hing Chung LUI,Kam Wah MA,Siu Ling MA,Chi Yuen TIK,Shun Ngo YU
Annual report on website
Yes
No
Financial audits on website
Yes
No
Board of directors on website
Yes
Yes

Sustainable Development Goals

SDGs
SDG17: Partnerships for the Goals
SDG4: Quality Education

Social links

Documents & video

Legal documents (audit)
View
View
Annual / impact report
View
Video intro

Organisation structure

Structure
Company limited by guarantee under the Companies Ordinance

Disclaimer

Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.

This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.