Back to directory
China Public Security Education Foundation Limited中國公共安全教育基金會有限公司
1st Step Association Limited自強協會有限公司
Comparison
China Public Security Education Foundation Limited vs 1st Step Association Limited
Key details
- Effective date
- 17 March 2016
- 9 December 2007
About
- Description
- China Public Security Education Foundation, English translation “China Public Security Education Foundation”, on April 23, 2015 Hong Kong was officially registered and established, becoming China’s first nonprofit organization dedicated to public safety education. On March 17, 2016, the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department issued the “Public Charitable Organization” certification. China Public Safety Education Foundation always takes “harm reduction” as its mission and “safety for life, education first” as its philosophy , Committed to improving the quality of national public safety. Through professional and effective education, citizens can cultivate public safety awareness and master public safety skills from an early age, so as to minimize accidental injuries.
- Mission: The Association primarily provides a one-stop services to the occupational injured quadriplegic persons and their families. The Association is concerned about the deprivation of the physically-handicapped whose disability is caused by spinal cord injury.
Contact
- Address
- Room A, 23rd Floor, Block A, Billion Center, No. 1 Wang Kwong Road, Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong
- 58-61, G/F, Kai Yue House, Kai Yip Estate, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- IRD verified
- —
- —
- Subsidiary
- No
- No
- Crowdfunding
- —
- —
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Governance & transparency
- Annual report on website
- No
- —
- Financial audits on website
- No
- —
- Board of directors on website
- Yes
- —
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDGs
- SDG3: Good Health and Well-being
- —
View full China Public Security Education Foundation Limited profileView full 1st Step Association Limited profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
