Back to directory
Chuang Tze Cheung Charity Foundation Limited莊紫祥慈善基金會有限公司
"Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited「我都得」教育基金有限公司
Comparison
Chuang Tze Cheung Charity Foundation Limited vs "Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited
Chuang Tze Cheung Charity Foundation Limited莊紫祥慈善基金會有限公司"Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited「我都得」教育基金有限公司Key details
- Effective date
- 6 September 2017
- 7 September 2012
- Charity number
- —
- 16/44583
About
- Description
- 莊紫祥先生傑出金融企業家，青年才俊，白手興家，事業成功後不忘關懷弱勢同胞，更心繫國家，立志創辦慈善事業，惠澤有需要的社群，而且對構建和諧社會，光大中華民族更有堅實的心願及使命。莊紫祥先生是香港又一村獅子會創會理事，多家企業的董事長，業務遍及新加坡，馬來西亞，中國，香港，展望將來更會申展至日本，韓國等地區。 三個目標: - 共同建設和諧社會，推行快樂慈善範式. - 關愛長者心靈照顧，組織傳統節慶關愛活動. - 培育青少年愛國情操，正思正念的思維. 六個配合: 1.配合國家政策，發展精準扶貧事業，構建和諧關愛社會 . 2.配合社福團體，扶持其他國家弱勢僑胞的福利事業. 3.配合政府呼籲，對突發性的災難事件施予援手. 4.配合香港又一村獅子會，共同籌辦關愛服務工作. 5.結合傳媒為合作夥伴，向社會傳播正念人生思維. 6.協助宗教事業，推行快樂的人生觀念.
- "Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited is a charity dedicated to empowering underprivileged youth through transformative overseas experiences. The organisation provides scholarships for students to participate in a one-year high school exchange program in the United States. This opportunity is designed to broaden their horizons, inspire them to see a future full of possibilities, and help them break the cycle of intergenerational poverty. The fund operates on the belief that when young people can see a future, they will not give up on themselves.
Contact
- Address
- —
- A402 Tai Po Garden N. T., Hong Kong
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- IRD verified
- —
- —
- Subsidiary
- No
- No
- Crowdfunding
- —
- —
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Governance & transparency
- Annual report on website
- No
- No
- Financial audits on website
- No
- No
- Board of directors on website
- No
- Yes
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDGs
- SDG11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
- SDG4: Quality Education
Social links
Documents & video
- Video intro
- —
- —
View full Chuang Tze Cheung Charity Foundation Limited profileView full "Yes I Can" Education Fund Limited profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.