Comparison

CSDCU Education Fund vs 2022 Foundation Limited

CSDCU Education Fund懲教社教育基金

Key details

Description: Mission: - To rebuild dilapidated school premises in remote areas in China -To improve the quality of teaching in remote areas in China - To subsidize poor students to continue their basic education - To offer assistance to schools in Hong Kong providing special education Vision: - To assist the development of basic education - To improve the education environment at the remote areas of China - To help people help themselves; 2022 Foundation, as a non-profit organization, seeks to facilitate the development of a long-term vision of what Hong Kong can accomplish by deepening and widening its knowledge platform. Mission: Recognizing the needs for Hong Kong to re-position itself in the global arena and the importance of developing reliable data and sound knowledge in the decision-making process, the 2022 Foundation will endeavor: 1. to serve as a round table of bringing together experts and leaders from academe, business, government and other sectors from Hong Kong, Mainland China and abroad into active cooperation in the provision of objective and cogent data to decision makers of Hong Kong 2. to foster cooperation in research in order to secure a better understanding of Hong Kong so that decisions can be made based on sound knowledge and reliable data 3. to promote, stimulate and provide complementary funding for relevant studies that have significant interests 4. to gather and collate technical information and to disseminate such information to the public

Address: 香港灣仔港灣道12號灣仔政府大樓低層地庫; 10th Floor, LiFung Tower, 888 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Hong Kong
Phone: 2511 0335; —
Email: info@csdcuedfund.org.hk; info@2022foundation.com
Website: csdcuedfund.org.hk/index-eng.htm; www.2022foundation.com

Beneficiaries: Children (persons under the age of 14)Those Under the Poverty Line; Other

SDGs: SDG4: Quality Education; SDG9: Industry and Innovation and Infrastructure

Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.

This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.