Back to directory
Comparison
Care For The Elderly Association Limited vs 100WF Hong Kong Foundation Limited
Key details
- Effective date
- 13 March 2007
- 4 July 2014
About
- Description
- Established in 2007 (formerly known as the Care for The Elderly Charity Ticket Organising Committee), Care for the Elderly Limited is a charitable organisation registered with the Hong Kong Government and recognised by the Inland Revenue Department. Mission: To help elderly-serving organizations raise funds
- Our mission is to strengthen the global finance industry by empowering women to achieve their professional potential at each career stage. We operate under a guiding principle that we call Vision 30/40. It is the goal for women to occupy 30% of senior investment roles and executive committee positions by 2040. Even with our efforts, and those of so many other organizations working towards gender equity, we still have quite a way to go for women to hold even close to the number of investment or executive roles in finance that men currently hold.
Contact
- Address
- Room C, 3/F, 123 Tung Chau Street, Worldwide Centre, Tai Kok Tsui,Kowloon
- 31st Floor, Tower Two, Times Square, 1 Matheson Street, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- IRD verified
- —
- —
- Subsidiary
- No
- No
- Crowdfunding
- —
- —
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Governance & transparency
- Directors
- Ting Shan NG,Francis Yin Ming CHAU,Lit Tung KWOK,Yuk Chi LEE,Hing Chung LUI,Kam Wah MA,Siu Ling MA,Chi Yuen TIK,Shun Ngo YU
- —
- Annual report on website
- Yes
- No
- Financial audits on website
- Yes
- No
- Board of directors on website
- Yes
- Yes
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDGs
- SDG17: Partnerships for the Goals
- SDG8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
Documents & video
- Video intro
- —
- —
Organisation structure
- Structure
- Company limited by guarantee under the Companies Ordinance
- —
View full Care For The Elderly Association Limited profileView full 100WF Hong Kong Foundation Limited profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
