Back to directory
Comparison
Clothing Industry Training Authority vs 100WF Hong Kong Foundation Limited
Key details
- Effective date
- 3 October 1976
- 4 July 2014
About
- Description
- The Clothing Industry Training Authority (CITA) was established in September 1975 according to the Industrial Training (Clothing Industry) Ordinance to provide training courses for the clothing and textile industry. Our mission is to assist the clothing industry to enhance its global competitiveness through the adoption of an industry-led approach to effectively strengthen our services in: - Training and developing management and technical professionals - Promoting sound commercial and industrial practices - Facilitating the application of innovation and technology
- Our mission is to strengthen the global finance industry by empowering women to achieve their professional potential at each career stage. We operate under a guiding principle that we call Vision 30/40. It is the goal for women to occupy 30% of senior investment roles and executive committee positions by 2040. Even with our efforts, and those of so many other organizations working towards gender equity, we still have quite a way to go for women to hold even close to the number of investment or executive roles in finance that men currently hold.
Contact
- Address
- 63 Tai Yip Street Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
- 31st Floor, Tower Two, Times Square, 1 Matheson Street, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- IRD verified
- —
- —
- Subsidiary
- No
- No
- Crowdfunding
- —
- —
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Governance & transparency
- Annual report on website
- Yes
- No
- Financial audits on website
- No
- No
- Board of directors on website
- Yes
- Yes
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDGs
- SDG8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
- SDG8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
Social links
Documents & video
View full Clothing Industry Training Authority profileView full 100WF Hong Kong Foundation Limited profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
