Back to directory
Comparison
Frutus Charitable Foundation Limited vs 100WF Hong Kong Foundation Limited
Key details
- Effective date
- 6 December 2020
- 4 July 2014
About
- Description
- Frutus Charitable Foundation Limited is a non-profit charity organization registered in July 2018. By organizing various activities related to "Sharing Fruit", we encourage the new generation to learn more about the good qualities of "empathy" and "social responsibility" to promote communication and harmony between different generations and different social groups. We also integrate the concept of "fruit is part of a healthy diet" into various activities we organize to let participants understand the importance of fruit to health.
- Our mission is to strengthen the global finance industry by empowering women to achieve their professional potential at each career stage. We operate under a guiding principle that we call Vision 30/40. It is the goal for women to occupy 30% of senior investment roles and executive committee positions by 2040. Even with our efforts, and those of so many other organizations working towards gender equity, we still have quite a way to go for women to hold even close to the number of investment or executive roles in finance that men currently hold.
Contact
- Address
- Room 3410, Cable TV Tower, 9 Hoi Shing Road Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong
- 31st Floor, Tower Two, Times Square, 1 Matheson Street, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- IRD verified
- —
- —
- Subsidiary
- No
- No
- Crowdfunding
- —
- —
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Governance & transparency
- Annual report on website
- No
- No
- Financial audits on website
- No
- No
- Board of directors on website
- No
- Yes
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDGs
- SDG11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
- SDG8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
Social links
Documents & video
View full Frutus Charitable Foundation Limited profileView full 100WF Hong Kong Foundation Limited profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
