Back to directory
China Everbright Charitable Foundation Company Limited中國光大控股慈善基金有限公司
Comparison
China Everbright Charitable Foundation Company Limited vs “CONCORDIA Tsat Sing Kong” Transitional Housing Project at Tsat Sing Kong, Pat Heung and Kam Tin, Yuen Long
This feature is intended for desktop use. Not mobile.
Key details
- Effective date
- 06/05/2008
- 03/09/1978
- Charity number
- 91/9346
- S11339
About
- Description
- In 2008, we established the China Everbright Charitable Foundation (CECF), a charitable organisation approved by the Hong Kong Government, to promote community development projects. For many years, the Everbright Charitable Foundation has sustainably sponsored a number of social service projects benefitting communities in Hong Kong and mainland China related to four main themes including “Bright Companion”, “Vitality Everbright”, “ Education Support ” and “ Art Promotion ”, including: CECF has formed a close partnership with Lifeline Express over the past couple of years, becoming one of its largest funding sources to help cure cataract patients in poverty-stricken areas in the Mainland.
- —
Contact
- Address
- 46/F, Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Road, Hong Kong
- —
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- Subsidiary
- No
- Yes
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Governance & transparency
- Annual report on website
- No
- —
- Financial audits on website
- No
- —
- Board of directors on website
- No
- —
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDGs
- SDG3: Good Health and Well-being
- —
Aliases & subsidiary
- Subsidiary name
- —
- “CONCORDIA Tsat Sing Kong” Transitional Housing Project at Tsat Sing Kong, Pat Heung and Kam Tin, Yuen Long
Organisation structure
- Structure
- Company limited by guarantee under the Companies Ordinance
- —
View full China Everbright Charitable Foundation Company Limited profileView full “CONCORDIA Tsat Sing Kong” Transitional Housing Project at Tsat Sing Kong, Pat Heung and Kam Tin, Yuen Long profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
