Back to directory
Chinese Association of Motivational Interviewing Limited中華動機式訪談法學會有限公司
Comparison
Chinese Association of Motivational Interviewing Limited vs "SMILE" Tai Po Early Education and Training Centre
This feature is intended for desktop use. Not mobile.
Key details
- Effective date
- 11/09/2015
- 27/07/1951
- Charity number
- 91/14361
- S11376
About
- Description
- The mission of CAMI is to promote continuous development of Motivational Interviewing (MI) and, through it, the well-being of Chinese societies. CAMI aims to: - advance education for and disseminate knowledge of Motivational Interviewing as a counseling approach in Chinese communities; - facilitate exploration of possible application of Motivational Interviewing knowledge and skills in different populations and settings; - educate and promote good practice in the use, research and training of Motivational Interviewing in Chinese cultures, languages, and contexts; - develop and share culturally relevant Motivational Interviewing materials and tools - support the continuing learning and skillfulness of its members through various communication channels - build connections with local or international bodies with shared interests in Motivational Interviewing
- —
Contact
- Address
- Unit 2305, Apec Plaza, 49 Hoi Yuen Road, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
- —
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- Subsidiary
- No
- Yes
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Governance & transparency
- Annual report on website
- No
- —
- Financial audits on website
- No
- —
- Board of directors on website
- Yes
- —
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDGs
- SDG8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
- —
Aliases & subsidiary
- Subsidiary name
- —
- "SMILE" Tai Po Early Education and Training Centre
Organisation structure
- Structure
- Company limited by guarantee under the Companies Ordinance
- —
View full Chinese Association of Motivational Interviewing Limited profileView full "SMILE" Tai Po Early Education and Training Centre profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
