Back to directory
Comparison
Evangelize China Fellowship Shatin Canaan Church Limited Bradbury Student Development Centre vs "Parent-Child Link" Specialised Co-parenting Support Centre
This feature is intended for desktop use. Not mobile.
Key details
- Effective date
- 08/07/1994
- 27/07/1951
- Charity number
- S06269
- S11374
About
- Description
- The Center is organized by Evangelize China Fellowship Shatin Canaan Church Limited. In 1990, the Church received funding from the Bradbury Foundation for the start-up costs, and the Center was officially opened in January 1991. Therefore, the Center was officially named " Evangelize China Fellowship Shatin Canaan Church Bradbury Student Development Centre." In 1997, the center successfully applied to become a member organization of the "Community Chest" and received funding. Furthermore, in 2003, it became a member organization of the "Hong Kong Council of Social Service" as well. The main service of Center is After-school Care Service on a self-financing basis, providing support to working parents. It offers primary school students services such as homework assistance, meal services, parent-child activities, as well as growth and developmental activities.
- —
Contact
- Address
- Flat 119-126, G/F, Sun Ming House, Sun Chui Estate, Shatin, New Territories
- —
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- Subsidiary
- Yes
- Yes
Categories
Target beneficiaries
Social links
Documents & video
- Legal documents (audit)
- —
- —
- Video intro
- —
- —
Aliases & subsidiary
- Subsidiary name
- Evangelize China Fellowship Shatin Canaan Church Limited Bradbury Student Development Centre
- "Parent-Child Link" Specialised Co-parenting Support Centre
Organisation structure
- Structure
- Company limited by guarantee under the Companies Ordinance
- —
View full Evangelize China Fellowship Shatin Canaan Church Limited Bradbury Student Development Centre profileView full "Parent-Child Link" Specialised Co-parenting Support Centre profile
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
