Back to directory
'Silver Go' Service Limited銀樂通服務有限公司
Comparison
General Chinese Charities Fund vs 'Silver Go' Service Limited
This feature is intended for desktop use. Not mobile.
Key details
- Effective date
- 10/04/1951
- 09/01/2021
- Charity number
- 91/43
- 91/17677
About
- Description
- The General Chinese Charities Fund consists of surpluses transferred from the Chinese Temples Fund in accordance with the provisions of the Chinese Temples Ordinance (Cap. 153). The Fund is administered by the Chinese Temples Committee chaired by the Secretary for Home Affairs. Fund Objectives: Grants from the Fund may be made to any Chinese charity in Hong Kong as the Chinese Temples Committee sees fit. In addition, sums are allocated annually to the Home Affairs Department Headquarters and to each District Office for emergency relief grants. Method of Application: Applications for charitable grants may be made through the Secretariat, Chinese Temples Committee, 34/F, Wu Chung House, 213 Queen's Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong. Applications for emergency relief arising from local incidents may be made through the District Office or the Government department concerned. For cases where Hong Kong residents are seriously injured or deceased in calamities outside Hong Kong, applications may be made to the Home Affairs Department Headquarters through the Immigration Department.
- "Silver Go" Service Limited is a registered charitable institution in Hong Kong, recognised under Section 88 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance. The organisation is dedicated to serving the elderly community. It provides supportive programs such as its 'Worry-Free Services' to enhance the well-being and peace of mind for seniors.
Contact
Status
- Subvented
- No
- No
- Subsidiary
- No
- No
Governance & transparency
- Annual report on website
- —
- No
- Financial audits on website
- —
- No
- Board of directors on website
- —
- No
Social links
Organisation structure
- Structure
- —
- Company limited by shares
Disclaimer
Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.
This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.
