Skip to main content

IRD Updates Map Analytics About Guides Extension Support

Charity Finder is a Shared Data initiative created to help the public and funders easily find information about Hong Kong's official Section 88 charities, all in one place.

About Shared Data · Support Our Work · Donate · Guides · Analytics · IRD Updates · Charity Map · Browser Extension

Built by Jon Pedersen · © 2026 Foundation for Shared Impact. All rights reserved. · Disclaimer · Privacy & Terms

Back to directory

Comparison

Society of Boys' Centres vs "New Horizons" Community Support Service Scheme

Society of Boys' Centres香港扶幼會

"New Horizons" Community Support Service Scheme香港遊樂場協會

Key details

Effective date: 12/06/1962; 31/07/1957
Charity number: 91/335; S09641

About

Description: The Society runs four residential service centres and three schools for social development, namely: Shing Tak Centre, Chak Yan Centre, Un Chau Hostel, Cheung Hong Hostel, Shing Tak Centre School, Chak Yan School and Hui Chung Sing Memorial School.; —

Contact

Address: 2/F, 47 Cornwall Street, Shamshuipo, Kowloon; 11/f, Southorn Centre, 130 Hennessy Road, Wan Chai,, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Phone: 27796442; —
Email: info@sbc.org.hk; —
Website: www.sbc.org.hk; www.hkpa.hk

Status

Subvented: Yes; Yes
Subsidiary: No; Yes

Categories

Categories: Human Services; —

Target beneficiaries

Beneficiaries: Children (persons under the age of 14)General Public Those Under the Poverty Line Youth (age between 15-24); —

Governance & transparency

Annual report on website: Yes; —
Financial audits on website: No; —
Board of directors on website: Yes; —

Sustainable Development Goals

SDGs: SDG1; SDG3; —

Documents & video

Legal documents (audit): —; —
Annual / impact report: View; —
Video intro: —; —

Aliases & subsidiary

Subsidiary name: —; "New Horizons" Community Support Service Scheme

View full Society of Boys' Centres profile View full "New Horizons" Community Support Service Scheme profile

Disclaimer

Information is based on publicly available data and may not reflect recent changes.

This comparison is not a legal or professional audit.